Huh? Oh yeah, so that’s the expression that’s all the rage right now: singa mahery vaika 🤣

The Ambohimalaza tragedy, 28 deaths to date, would therefore be criminal and the murder weapon would be a “ singa mahery vaika ”.

I don’t even know how to translate that into English… a powerful toxic poison?

Uh, I don’t mean guys, but it all seems… a bit light, right? And we’re no further ahead than with the experience of mice, struck dead by lightning.

Even before these analyses abroad, we were told that it was a “ strong element ”. And 3 weeks later, we are still told that it is a “ strong element ”? 🤣 Let’s be serious.

I am neither a toxicologist, nor a criminologist, nor even a medical scientist, just a simple citizen, but even so, all this seems to me to be too light to establish with certainty a criminal intention as long as we do not have the precise name of this “ singa mahery vaika ”.

Let’s take a simple example: imagine, I mean imagine, that this singa mahery vaika turns out to be nuvan. Is the criminal intent certified? Well no, it could just as easily have been accidental; domestic accidents in the kitchen happen.

On the other hand, let’s now imagine that singa mahery vaika is called strychnine? Then it would be completely different because strychnine, unlike nuvan, is not found at the local grocery store.

So yes, we can really talk about criminal intent, premeditated murder .
This is why this case requires enormous medical and scientific rigor. We cannot rely on sensationalist claims of an endemic nature, while rallying the media to their aid.

A complete analysis report must be provided, detailed, precise, and beyond doubt. This report must include the name of the murder weapon, as they say, its name, properties, effects, and all the rest.

So no, your singa mahery vaika is not enough tompokolahy sy tompokovavy. And besides, the nickel-plated feet who triumphantly spoke in front of the cameras admitted it themselves: the analyses are not complete and require additional investigations.

Caution would have been advised and if it was really necessary to express an opinion, a statement like “ investigations are underway and progressing well but the conclusions of the analyses will require 3 to 6 weeks ” would have been more than sufficient.

Instead, we are served pseudo-conclusions peremptorily asserting criminal intent, which contribute more to popular savorivory than anything else.
So please, shut up once and for all and only come back in front of the camera with the name of the poison (or its composition) and a solid, complete, exhaustive analysis file.

Singa mahery vaika lol. Singapore yes, as long as we’re talking nonsense.